![]() ![]() > M1 with BigSur, and the other one is a regular Intel Mac with Catalina. > I'm running some tests on a couple of Mac Mini machines. > Does anyone have any ideas on how I could proceed? So it seems not to work there either sadly. > client list in my Cluster but the drive is never mapped to the directory I To change the security setting on your MacBook with the M1 chip, you need to go into macOS Recovery mode. denied message as well as pop up explaining that you will need to change your security settings in order to allow macfuse to run. > times and it seems that it connects because the client is added to the Creating an Rclone Mount on Apple Silicon (M1 Chips). > On the Catalina Intel-mac I was able to build it and ran ceph-fuse multiple Perhaps a find_package() call is missing for an IMPORTED target, > Target "rbd-fuse" links to target "FUSE::FUSE" but the target was not > CMake Error at src/rbd_fuse/CMakeLists.txt:1 (add_executable): > /Users/danielp/Library/Logs/Homebrew/ceph-client/03.cmake: > mac and it did not compile because it didn't have a FUSE:FUSE target > Or maybe there is a brew version, if you search for fuse on home brew this Well, it is, to some extent, but there is only one developer who has to work his ass off to keep up with Apple changing macOS with each update/release and the FUSE devs doing their thing, which he has to join in his code.I've tried with a couple of different libraries.īut none of them helped with installation or connection for the machine That said, just for the records: MacFUSE is _ not _ the same as the Linux FUSE implementations. That is also where the bug reports come from. As an integral part of many Linux applications (the libfuse is a library many developers use) it has been battle tested in all sorts of environments. Why? Because I try to install only what I need, if it has powerful system permissions.Īm I not worried about the next security vulnerability? Well, no. By default, custom extensions are blocked. _shrug_ĭo I have MacFUSE installed on all my machines? No. Foldr for macOS requires a custom Kernel extension (macFUSE) to be approved before the app will work as expected. It's the sign of the times that everything is patched continuously, starting with the os (the last Security Patch for macOS is 3 weeks old) to every app we run. And there have been plenty enough, the last about 8 weeks ago (just look at the releases of either Linux' libfuse or MacFUSE/OSXFUSE to get an idea).ĭoes that mean it is risky to run MacFUSE? No, not more than running anything else. All of that is no problem in itself, but it opens the attack surface, as in: some other user can try to do something that usually requires elevated permissions because misusing FUSE will have these.Īs vague as this sounds, this means that a security vulnerability can become a problem. The nice thing about FUSE (as the name aptly states) is the fact, that is doesn't need system admin privileges (as file system drivers usually do) but can run in user space. Well, for starters, this is a file system driver, that needs to run with system privileges and is thus installed for all users on a system, not just for you. Nobody took you up on your question about risks. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |